CO129-57 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [7] — Page 135

to produce them, and I quoted on this point a case in which the East hidin Courany

Stuecrued.

Ava:

Me prition was contnetek neither by Judge un Cruusel,

and I then handen in

for

scend

the corruns written authority, expressive my readinces &

creu intru

to give

information in my power.

A

In neither of the Publie Rints, publiching the Avidcnee,

am

0

conectý reported, and the Register's version is morery distortá

for the purpose of personnic attack.

But coniction of the

errasi

meccssary especially in the

132

free of the complimentary terms

Evidence by the

arslied to my

Chief Justice and Counsel for the

priconer in ancwer to

a serious

expostulation from myself in the withers boy

As regards the result of the trial I consider it to turn entirels

ma

difference of legal opinion.

between the Attorney General and

the Chief Justice - the former arguing - the the Acts of Parlament were

月

Paricament were

eufficiently comprehensive to make the acts of the Sheriff

however indirect and incomplete

come under the term Misdemeanor, the latter